Newcomb v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defense counsel acted properly when he cited to ethics rule that sufficiently informed court of anticipated perjury by defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Chambers
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-05-25· cited 17×
• Huitt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-03-02· cited 14×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ben Lee Brown v. Walter E. Craven
  Ninth Circuit· 1970-05-13· cited 223×
• The People v. Solomon
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1962-05-25· cited 149×
• Risher v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 148×
• Doe v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1971-07-09· cited 119×
• United States ex rel. Wilcox v. Johnson
  Third Circuit· 1977-04-29· cited 100×
• People v. Schultheis
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-10-19· cited 73×
• Coleman v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1980-10-10· cited 71×
• Scott v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1974-03-01· cited 61×
• Wright v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1972-10-06· cited 53×
• Salazar v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-12-17· cited 53×
• State v. Henderson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1970-04-11· cited 52×
• Klockenbrink v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1970-07-31· cited 50×
• Maddox v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-04-04· cited 50×
• Thornton v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-05-19· cited 46×
• Nielsen v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1981-02-06· cited 17×
• People v. Salquerro
  New York Supreme Court· 1980-11-13· cited 16×