Skip to main content
· 9/8/2006

Nevadans for Nevada v. Beers

Citations

  • 142 P.3d 339
  • 122 Nev. 930
  • 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 80
  • 2006 Nev. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statutes requiring a description of the initiative’s effect and permitting a challenge to that description facilitate the people’s initiative power
  • providing that Nevada’s Constitution “should be read as a whole, so as to give effect to and harmonize each provision”
  • providing that in the absence of any factual dispute, this court reviews a district court’s decision to grant or deny declaratory and injunctive relief de novo
  • explaining that this court reviews de nova a district court's order denying declaratory relief when there are no factual disputes
  • explaining that, when no facts are disputed in ballot matters, this court reviews orders denying declaratory and injunctive relief de novo
  • explaining that \the Nevada Constitution is the organic and fundamental law of this state\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.