· 9/8/2006
Nevadans for Nevada v. Beers
Citations
- 142 P.3d 339
- 122 Nev. 930
- 122 Nev. Adv. Rep. 80
- 2006 Nev. LEXIS 102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that statutes requiring a description of the initiative’s effect and permitting a challenge to that description facilitate the people’s initiative power
- providing that Nevada’s Constitution “should be read as a whole, so as to give effect to and harmonize each provision”
- providing that in the absence of any factual dispute, this court reviews a district court’s decision to grant or deny declaratory and injunctive relief de novo
- explaining that this court reviews de nova a district court's order denying declaratory relief when there are no factual disputes
- explaining that, when no facts are disputed in ballot matters, this court reviews orders denying declaratory and injunctive relief de novo
- explaining that \the Nevada Constitution is the organic and fundamental law of this state\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.