Skip to main content
· 11/26/2008

William M. v. State

Citations

  • 196 P.3d 456
  • 124 Nev. 1150
  • 124 Nev. Adv. Rep. 95
  • 2008 Nev. LEXIS 110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the statute’s “requirement that a juvenile admit the charged criminal conduct, and thereby incriminate himself, in order to overcome the presumption of adult certification is unconstitutional.”
  • noting that the California Supreme Court recognized certification \as the worst punishment the juvenile system is empowered to inflict\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • noting that the California Supreme Court recognized certification \as the worst punishment the juvenile system is empowered to inflict\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • noting that the California Supreme Court recognized certification \as the worst punishment the juvenile system is empowered to inflict\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • Fifth Amendment right against self- incrimination
  • Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.