· 11/26/2008
William M. v. State
Citations
- 196 P.3d 456
- 124 Nev. 1150
- 124 Nev. Adv. Rep. 95
- 2008 Nev. LEXIS 110
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the statute’s “requirement that a juvenile admit the charged criminal conduct, and thereby incriminate himself, in order to overcome the presumption of adult certification is unconstitutional.”
- noting that the California Supreme Court recognized certification \as the worst punishment the juvenile system is empowered to inflict\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- noting that the California Supreme Court recognized certification \as the worst punishment the juvenile system is empowered to inflict\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- noting that the California Supreme Court recognized certification \as the worst punishment the juvenile system is empowered to inflict\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- Fifth Amendment right against self- incrimination
- Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.