State v. Cappalo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding state statute proscribing interference with police officer in the performance of his duties
• upholding constitutionality of obstruction of justice statute, but interpreting it to exclude situations in which a defendant merely questions a police officer’s authority or protests his or her action
• construing narrowly statute proscribing interfering with peace officer to save it from overbreadth challenge
• statute providing that a “person is guilty of interfering with an officer when he obstructs, resists, hinders or endangers any peace officer ... in the performance of his duties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).