Netscape Communications Corp. v. ValueClick, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, we must presume that the use of these different terms in the claims connote different meanings”
• “in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, we must presume that the use of these different terms in the claims connote different meanings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Netscape Communications Corp. v. Valueclick, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 2010-01-29· cited 8×
• Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. Sprint Communications Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-08-15· cited 3×

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
• MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.
  Supreme Court· 1996-04-29· cited 3,226×
• Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 2,940×
• Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-07-25· cited 2,428×
• Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 1,180×
• Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)
  Federal Circuit· 2004-08-11· cited 753×
• Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1998-11-18· cited 719×
• Liebel-Flarsheim Company and Mallinckrodt Inc. v. Medrad, Inc., Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2004-02-11· cited 685×
• Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1998-09-09· cited 607×
• Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1999-06-23· cited 590×
• 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-04-03· cited 533×
• Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2001-03-14· cited 465×
• Catalina Marketing International, Inc. v. coolsavings.com, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2002-05-08· cited 360×
• Multiform Desiccants, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Medzam, Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-01-15· cited 323×
• Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. And Competitive Technologies, Inc. v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (Doing Business as Labcorp)
  Federal Circuit· 2004-06-08· cited 291×
• Rhodia Chimie & Rhodia, Inc. v. PPG Industries Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-04-11· cited 250×
• Rexnord Corporation v. The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2001-11-15· cited 249×
• Interactive Gift Express, Inc. v. Compuserve Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2001-07-13· cited 234×
• Bicon, Inc v. The Straumann Company
  Federal Circuit· 2006-03-20· cited 199×
• Altiris, Inc. v. Symantec Corp., Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2003-03-10· cited 147×