Skip to main content
· 4/2/2010

Netscape Communications Corp. v. VALUECLICK, INC.

Citations

  • 704 F. Supp. 2d 544
  • 76 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 764
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32817
  • 2010 WL 1303473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Until the Federal Circuit further clarifies this issue, the safest course, in the circumstances, is to apply the Finnigan corroboration requirement broadly.”
  • discussing the requirements for corroborating interested and disinterested witnesses’ testimony
  • discussing the requirements for corroborating interested and disinterested witnesses’ testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: T.S. Ellis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.