· 4/2/2010
Netscape Communications Corp. v. VALUECLICK, INC.
Citations
- 704 F. Supp. 2d 544
- 76 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 764
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 32817
- 2010 WL 1303473
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Until the Federal Circuit further clarifies this issue, the safest course, in the circumstances, is to apply the Finnigan corroboration requirement broadly.”
- discussing the requirements for corroborating interested and disinterested witnesses’ testimony
- discussing the requirements for corroborating interested and disinterested witnesses’ testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: T.S. Ellis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.