Multiform Desiccants, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Medzam, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that an inventor, acting as a lexicographer, may bestow \a special meaning to a term in order to convey a character or property or nuance relevant to the particular invention\
• affirming a district court’s decision to not reach the issue of validity, where the jury separately determined there was no infringement
• describing the specification as “[t]he best source for understanding a technical term”
• “It is the person of ordinary skill in the field of the invention through whose 2008-1602 5 eyes the claims are construed.”
• the inventor's words \must be understood and interpreted by the court as they would be understood and interpreted by a person in that field of technology\
• the inventor’s words “must be understood and interpreted by the court as they would be understood and interpreted by a person in that field of technology”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).