Pelikan v. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that summary should reflect effect on plaintiffs lawyers of a general limitation on contingent fees
• concluding that “yes” vote result statement should reflect effect on plaintiffs lawyers of a general limitation on contingent fees
• explaining that Attorney General may go beyond terms of ballot measure only when the effect of the measure is not reasonably subject to dispute
• explaining that Attorney General may go beyond terms of ballot measure only when the effect of the measure is not reasonably subject to dispute
• “[T]his court has explained that it will not speculate about the possible effects of a proposed measure.”
• “[T]his court has explained that it will not speculate about the possible effects of a proposed measure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).