Woolridge v. Woolridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the record must properly frame the legal and factual issues such that meaningful appellate review is possible
• noting that in addition to the statutory factors found in section 452.340.1, debt is an example of a possible non-Form 14 factor the court might consider
• discussing the trial court’s rejection of a Form 14 calculation by a party
• although respondent asserted in her brief that both parties were advised of the court’s reasons for a deviation from the presumed child support amount, the reasons were never articulated in the record
• discussing the requirements of Section 452.340 and Rule 88.01

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).