Nelson v. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inability to pay is a valid defense but burden of proving such defense rests upon party asserting it
• “[i]nasmuch as [the defendant] carried the burden of proof, the court’s refusal to find his inability to pay is deemed an adverse finding on that issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Krokyn v. Krokyn
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-06-06· cited 34×
• Matter of Hooker
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-10-22· cited 21×
• Dial v. Dial
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-06-04· cited 9×
• State Ex Rel. Udall v. Wimberly
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-08-30· cited 7×
• State ex rel. Human Services Department v. Kelley
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2003-01-27· cited 5×
• Sosaya v. Sosaya
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1977-01-04· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Galvan v. Miller
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-08-26· cited 61×
• Gallegos v. Wilkerson
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-09-23· cited 36×
• State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Pelletier
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-07-18· cited 22×
• Wilson v. Wilson
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1941-06-09· cited 10×
• Lopez v. Barboa
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-06-16· cited 8×
• Andrews v. McMahan
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-12-20· cited 8×
• Armijo v. Armijo
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1923-06-07· cited 6×
• Nesbit v. Nesbit
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1969-05-26· cited 5×
• Horcasitas v. House
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1965-07-06· cited 3×
• Sears v. Sears
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1939-02-08· cited 3×
• State ex rel. Beach v. Board of Loan Commissioners
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-06-10· cited 3×