State v. Freber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that testimony regarding a prior, out-of-court identification is admissible if the identifying witness testifies to such identification and is subject to cross-examination
• expanding the rule to allow identification evidence as substantive evidence because requiring \the declarant's presence in court and availability for cross-examination eliminate[s] the usual danger of hearsay testimony\
• discussing an inability to testify altogether

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).