Skip to main content
· 12/7/1973

Neal v. Gatlin

Citations

  • 35 Cal. App. 3d 871
  • 111 Cal. Rptr. 117
  • 1973 Cal. App. LEXIS 762

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that an employee’s act “is deemed to be within the scope of his employment” only if “the object or end to be accomplished is within the employee’s express and implied authority”
  • where public employee was acting within employee's express or implied authority, notwithstanding wrongful nature of the act, complaint based on such act was properly dismissed for failure to allege filing of claim with employing public entity
  • where public employee was acting within employee’s express or implied authority, notwithstanding wrongful nature of the act, complaint based on such act was properly dismissed for failure to allege filing of claim with employing public entity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Franson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.