Skip to main content
· 12/27/1995

Sheila Conkle v. Sulinna Jeong, D/B/A Laird's Food Market Baldwin Jeong Local 1179, United Food and Commercial Workers International

Citations

  • 73 F.3d 909
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 17147
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9853
  • 33 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1347
  • 60 Cal. Comp. Cases 1198
  • 151 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2065
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36637
  • 1995 WL 759007

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Assuming that [plaintiff] properly requested Rule 56(f) relief, the district court had discretion to deny the relief.”
  • stating that this court has never held a union liable for an error made in evaluating the merits of a grievance, absent proof of discrimination or bad faith
  • district court does not abuse its 4 discretion by denying further discovery if the movant has failed diligently to pursue discovery in 5 the past
  • \The burden is on the party seeking to conduct additional discovery to put forth sufficient facts to show that the evidence sought exists.\
  • “The 21 burden is on the party seeking to conduct additional discovery to put forth sufficient facts to show 22 that the evidence sought exists.”
  • “The 24 burden is on the party seeking to conduct additional discovery to put forth sufficient facts to show 25 that the evidence sought exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Wiggins, Leavy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.