Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 2/18/1878

Neal v. Clark

Citations

  • 95 U.S. 704
  • 24 L. Ed. 586
  • 1877 U.S. LEXIS 2225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that debt created through receipt of a fraudulent conveyance must be actual fraud, not merely constructive fraud, to bar from discharge in bankruptcy
  • noting that “fraud” under a predecessor to § 523(a)(4) required actual, intentional fraud “as does embezzlement”
  • noting that \fraud\ under a predecessor to § 523(a)(4) required actual, intentional fraud \as does embezzlement\
  • emphasizing that Congress’s “object and intention ... in enacting” bankruptcy laws was to relieve “honest citizen[s] ... from the burden of hopeless insolvency” (emphasis added)
  • noting that, under third section of the bankrupt law of 1867, embezzlement involved moral turpitude or intentional wrong
  • confirming that the “meaning of a word” must be “ascertained by reference” to “the context” surrounding it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

267 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named Neal v. Clark

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.