In the Matter of John E. Mayer and Deborah Mayer, Debtors-Appellants v. Spanel International Ltd. And Bank One-Rockford, N.A., Creditors-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We do not create conflicts among the circuits without strong cause. A conflict here would be gratuitous.”
• “A victim who lacks access to the truth, and has not been alerted to facts that would alert him to the truth, is not to be ... blocked by a discharge under the bankruptcy laws [] just because he did not conduct a more thorough investigation.”
• “A victim who lacks access to the truth, and has not been alerted to facts that would alert him to the truth, is not to...be blocked by a discharge under the bankruptcy laws–just because he did not conduct a more thorough investigation.”
• “A victim who lacks access to the truth, and has not been alerted to facts that would alert him to the truth, is not to be . . . blocked by a discharge under the bankruptcy laws . . . just because he did not conduct a more thorough investigation.”
• “A victim who lacks access to the truth, and has not been alerted to facts that would alert him to the truth, is not to be . . . blocked by a discharge under the bankruptcy laws . . . just because he did not conduct a more thorough investigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).