Leeb v. Guy (In Re Guy)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in order to prevent discharge under 523(a)(2)(A), \a creditor must have given present consideration based on the . . . actual fraud\
• following Kraus under Indiana law after lengthy analysis of the cases
• “[A] mere breach of contract by the debtor without more, does not imply existence of actual fraud for purposes of the exception to discharge under § 523(a)(2)(A).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).