Skip to main content
D.C. Circuit· 5/28/2010

NATTAH v. Bush

Citations

  • 605 F.3d 1052
  • 390 U.S. App. D.C. 435
  • 30 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1368
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 10965
  • 2010 WL 2134281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court erred in not considering the plaintiff’s amended claims when the plaintiff amended the complaint as a matter of right pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)
  • holding that plaintiff need not “plead every conceivable fact” to survive motion to dismiss
  • explaining that neither /gbal nor Twombly “require[] a plaintiff to plead every conceivable fact” relevant to breach of contract claim
  • noting that Court agrees only “with two of [Nattah’s] claims of error”
  • affirming dismissal of qui tam action for failure to file the complaint under seal or comply with any of the other procedural filing requirements
  • finding error when the district court failed to refuse to consider claims added as a matter of right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named NATTAH v. Bush

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.