Skip to main content
· 4/28/2014

Nabaya v. Dudeck

Citations

  • 38 F. Supp. 3d 86
  • 2014 WL 1664964
  • 113 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1901
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff was entitled to amend as a matter of right, even if “amendment of his complaint will be short-lived,” because there was no private cause of action
  • “[D]ue to the plaintiff’s pro se status, dismissal of his case without giving him the opportunity to perfect service is inappropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Reggie B. Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.