United States v. William N. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a preliminary hearing is not a “discovery mechanism for the defendant” and a defendant may not “demand a preliminary hearing after indictment”
• prohibiting argument that would “naturally and necessarily” be taken as comment on failure of accused to testify
• pronouncement by our Judge Russell that “[n]o right is more precious than the right of suffrage”
• pronouncement by our Judge Russell that “[n]o right is more precious than the right of suffrage”
• question “What do the defendants say?” not a comment on failure to testify
• question \What do the defendants say?\ not a comment on failure to testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).