Nash v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no abuse of discretion in allowing social worker’s testimony, over hearsay objection, that child victim appeared surprised and frightened that witness knew of abuse
• a judge who had presided over a previous, related trial resulting in the defendant’s conviction on similar charges was not required to recuse himself.
• where trial judge presided over earlier, related trial involving the same defendant, “even where judge is to be the fact finder, there is no per se rule requiring recusal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ali v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-12-07· cited 56×
• Surratt v. Prince George's County
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-09-04· cited 50×
• Eiland v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-08· cited 50×
• Gatewood v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-08· cited 23×
• Runge v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-17· cited 7×
• Blankenship v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-12-13· cited 7×
• Roselle v. Heirs and Devisees of Grover
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1990-03-13· cited 5×
• Pearlstein v. Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-01-13· cited 5×
• Kirkland v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-05-04· cited 5×
• Worsham v. Greenfield
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-08-27· cited 3×
• Palmer v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-07-05· cited 2×