Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/4/1988
Kirkland v. State
Citations
- 540 A.2d 490
- 75 Md. App. 49
- 1988 Md. App. LEXIS 90
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Affirming that “the Hillman doctrine provides that when the performance of a particular act by an individual is an issue in the case, his intention (state of mind
- “[A] party is free to introduce anything in the nature of an admission an opposing party has said or done which is relevant to the case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bishop, Alpert, Karwacki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- B. SIFRIT v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-08-27· cited 50×
- Briggeman v. AlbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-02-26· cited 34×
- Suburban Hospital, Inc. v. Maryland Health Resources Planning CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-01· cited 7×
- Figgins v. CochraneCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-06· cited 5×
- Gray v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-03-28· cited 5×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Hillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-05· cited 136×
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KuhlCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-08-11· cited 59×
- Streams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-04-05· cited 57×
- Maryland Paper Products Co. v. JudsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1958-03-03· cited 53×
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-07-08· cited 26×
- Nash v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-01-12· cited 15×
- Pharr v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-07· cited 14×
- Ebert v. RitcheyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-04-14· cited 13×
- Mouzon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-03-03· cited 7×
- Hodge v. DuleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-08-09· cited 4×
- Sobus v. KnisleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-02-03· cited 4×
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-04-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.