Nagel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that a police officer’s testimony was inadmissible because the state did not present evidence that the contested telephone call “was made with appellant’s authority, consent, or knowledge”
• ruling that a police officer’s testimony was inadmissible because the state did not present evidence that the contested telephone call “was made with appellant’s authority, consent, or knowledge”
• ruling that a police officer’s testimony was inadmissible because the state did not present evidence that the contested telephone call “was made with appellant’s authority, consent, or knowledge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Frank Special v. West Boca Medical Center
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-11-13· cited 135×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Goodwin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-12-16· cited 292×
• Justus v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-01· cited 63×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-06-09· cited 21×
• Nagel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-11· cited 1×