Arizona Supreme Court· 5/26/1947

Murphy v. State

Citations

181 P.2d 336
65 Ariz. 338
1947 Ariz. LEXIS 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that out-of-state cases are of little precedential value for interpreting Arizona’s Enabling Act because the latter “marked a complete and absolute departure from the enabling acts” of other states
recounting history of abuses that led Congress to insert the restrictions in the Arizona-New Mexico Enabling Act
recounting history of abuses that led Congress to insert the restrictions in the Arizona-New Mexico Enabling Act
trust attaches to proceeds of permanent fund derived from school lands
“The Arizona Constitution cannot be inconsistent with the Enabling Act.”
\The Arizona Constitution cannot be inconsistent with the Enabling Act.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laprade, Stanford, Udall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.