District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 8/29/1978
Moore v. Moore
Citations
- 391 A.2d 762
- 1978 D.C. App. LEXIS 298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the interpretation of Rule 15(b) of the Civil Rules of Procedure is “aided by” interpretations of the analogous federal rule
- affirming trial court's award of certain unprayed-for relief because D.C.R. Civ. P. 54(c) and child's best interests give the judge power and duty to grant complete relief
- affirming trial court's award of certain unprayed-for relief because D.C. R. Civ. P. 54(c) and child's best interests give the judge power and duty to grant complete relief
- discussing how parties implicitly consented to try issues through evidence presented at trial
- failure to object to introduction of evidence related to a “new issue” is the “clearest indication]; ] of a party’s implied consent”
- record must reflect “relatively thorough investigation” of child’s needs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gallagher, Ferren, Moultrie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-11-13· cited 146×
- Rosenthal v. National Produce Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-04-18· cited 80×
- Petition of DISDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-07-03· cited 64×
- In re D.R.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-02-28· cited 63×
- Nimetz v. CappadonaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-09-17· cited 47×
- Finkelstein v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-06-05· cited 45×
- Bazemore v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-12-01· cited 42×
- Leftwich v. LeftwichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-02-05· cited 42×
- Raskauskas v. Temple Realty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-04-04· cited 37×
- Ingber v. RossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-06-20· cited 34×
- Fitzgerald v. FitzgeraldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-13· cited 32×
- Petition of RMGDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-12-29· cited 32×
- Rice v. RiceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-05-30· cited 31×
- Randolph v. Franklin Inv. Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-01-29· cited 29×
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-02-02· cited 28×
- Prost v. GreeneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-01-05· cited 28×
- Flippo Construction Co. v. Mike Parks Diving Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-09-17· cited 27×
- Martin v. TateDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-05-13· cited 25×
- E.R.B. v. J.H.F.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-08-12· cited 25×
- Lewis v. LewisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-02-03· cited 20×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- George Eric Rosden v. A. LeutholdD.C. Circuit· 1960-01-19· cited 52×
- Albert J. Wasik v. Robert W. Borg, and Third-Party v. Ford Motor Company, Third-PartySecond Circuit· 1970-03-10· cited 51×
- Hamilton Ex Rel. Hamilton v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1968-11-12· cited 38×
- Mumma v. MummaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-08-06· cited 33×
- Paul Cole, Administrator of the Estate of Boyd Byron Cole v. Layrite Products Company, a Washington CorporationNinth Circuit· 1971-03-17· cited 30×
- Cobbe Ex Rel. Cobbe v. CobbeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1960-08-05· cited 24×
- Utley v. UtleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-10-11· cited 20×
- Smith v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-09-10· cited 19×
- Paine v. PaineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1970-06-26· cited 16×
- O'Meara v. O'MearaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-07-09· cited 14×
- Wood v. WoodDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-07-14· cited 13×
- Wright v. WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-05-19· cited 12×
- Grasty v. GrastyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1973-03-29· cited 11×
- Eisenberg v. EisenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-05-19· cited 11×
- Seek v. EdgarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1972-07-26· cited 10×
- Jacobson v. JacobsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-05-10· cited 9×
- Crain v. CrainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1965-04-12· cited 6×
- Ross v. RossDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-06-10· cited 5×
- Lee v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1973-07-20· cited 2×
- Johnson v. RidgewayDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-03-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.