Murphy-Bey v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing Rule 16’s “reciprocal” obligations, and noting that once the “appellant requested that the government make expert witness disclosures under Rule 16, he himself was also required to make similar disclosures to the government under the same rule”
• “[E]vidence [related to a theory of defense] may come from either the prosecution or the defense, or a combination of the two.”
• “[A] defendant is entitled to a jury instruction on a theory of the case that negates his guilt of the crime charged if the instruction is supported by any evidence, however weak.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).