Katrell A. Henry v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant not entitled to self-defense instruction where there “was no evidence that either [a witness] or appellant perceived that [the decedent] was armed”
• self-defense theory proffered in ex parte bench conference before defendant took the stand
• defendant not entitled to self-defense instruction because “no evidence was presented that gave the jury a basis for finding 31 that appellant reasonably believed that [the decedent] was about to start shooting” (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).