District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 5/16/2013
Kittle v. United States
Citations
- 65 A.3d 1144
- 2013 WL 2102150
- 2013 D.C. App. LEXIS 264
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[TJhere was no evidence, ‘however weak,’ to establish that appellant acted out of a fear of imminent harm.”
- “[T]here was no evidence, ‘however weak,’ to establish that appellant acted out of a fear of imminent harm.”
- “To invoke self-defense, there must be some evidence that: (1) appellant actually believed he was in imminent danger of bodily harm, and (2) he had reasonable grounds for that belief.” (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackburne, Rigsby, Steadman, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pena-Rodriguez v. ColoradoSupreme Court· 2017-03-06· cited 326×
- Pena-Rodriguez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2015-05-18· cited 17×
- Vines v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-07-11· cited 12×
- TAMEKA PARKER v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-03-16
- Miguel Aguilar, Jr. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2017-09-26
- Binion v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-08-08
- Kelecha v. MengheshaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-04-10
- Tommy James Rumph v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2026-03-13
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,407×
- Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court· 1983-12-12· cited 1,013×
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 915×
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-01-31· cited 771×
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court· 1915-06-14· cited 734×
- Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 651×
- United States v. Jermaine Boney, United States of America v. Donald A. HollomanD.C. Circuit· 1992-10-13· cited 155×
- Fleshner v. Pepose Vision Institute, P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri· 2010-02-09· cited 155×
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-14· cited 99×
- Raul Lara Martinez v. Food City, Inc., D/B/A FoodlandFifth Circuit· 1981-10-07· cited 71×
- United States v. Rex Henley, Rafael Bustamante, Willie McGowan and Garey WestNinth Circuit· 2001-02-07· cited 65×
- James B. Shillcutt v. John R. GagnonSeventh Circuit· 1987-08-27· cited 62×
- Sellars v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-04-27· cited 60×
- United States v. BenallyTenth Circuit· 2008-11-12· cited 56×
- United States v. VillarFirst Circuit· 2009-11-10· cited 43×
- Reid v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-11· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. LaguerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-05-14· cited 40×
- United States v. Rayfield WilsonD.C. Circuit· 1976-04-15· cited 36×
- Ronald A. Williams v. James Price, Superintendent, Sci-Pittsburgh D. Michael Fisher, Attorney GeneralThird Circuit· 2003-09-09· cited 36×
- State v. HidanovicNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2008-04-17· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.