Skip to main content
· 6/19/1990

Harkala v. Wildwood Realty, Inc.

Citations

  • 558 N.E.2d 195
  • 200 Ill. App. 3d 447
  • 146 Ill. Dec. 232
  • 1990 Ill. App. LEXIS 883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the Consumer Fraud Act is intended to provide greater protection than the common law action of fraud, and therefore, “a plaintiff need not show actual reliance or diligence in ascertaining the accuracy of the misstatements”
  • finding that the Consumer Fraud Act is intended to provide greater protection than the common law action of fraud, and therefore “a plaintiff need not show actual reliance or diligence in ascertaining the accuracy of the misstatements”
  • affirming summary judgment in favor of real estate brokers who had no duty to investigate home for concealed defects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.