Skip to main content
· 9/10/1999

Mullis v. Brennan

Citations

  • 716 N.E.2d 58
  • 1999 Ind. App. LEXIS 1482
  • 1999 WL 701636

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that some incidents of noncompliance, standing alone, are not sufficient to support a finding of a deceptive act because no prejudice result ed therefrom
  • noting that the repudiation must be “positive, absolute, and unconditional”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ratliff, Riley, Mattingly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.