Skip to main content
· 10/16/1986

Boucher v. Exide Corp.

Citations

  • 498 N.E.2d 402
  • 1986 Ind. App. LEXIS 3029

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a successful reopening motion suggests the trustee would not have abandoned the claim were he properly made aware of it
  • the fact that the debtor-plaintiff did not list his cause of action on his bankruptcy schedule prevented abandonment by the trustee
  • plaintiff's tort claims not listed on bankruptcy schedule \remained in the bankruptcy estate and Bouchers had no standing to bring the lawsuit\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Buchanan, Shields

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.