Homer v. Burman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a contractor was bound to abide by the applicable electric code and the Indiana Home Improvement Contracts Act, both of which were in existence when the contract was formed
• “In a contract for work, there is an implied duty to do the work skillfully, carefully, and in a workmanlike manner.” (alteration omitted) (quoting Hagerman Constr., Inc. v. Copeland, 697 N.E.2d 948, 958 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998))
• same under Indiana law, applicable to Flowers and the Hutchinsons
• same under Indiana law, applicable to Flowers and the Hutchinsons
• same under Indiana law, applicable to Flowers and the Hutchinsons
• same under Indiana law, applicable to Flowers and the Hutchinsons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).