District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2/16/1996
Moya v. State
Citations
- 668 So. 2d 279
- 1996 WL 65778
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that pursuant to this Court's decision in Abreu and rule 3.050, the trial court can and should sua sponte enlarge the time for ruling on such a motion when the court is unable to rule upon a timely filed motion to mitigate within the allotted sixty-day window
- holding that pursuant to this Court’s decision in Abreu and rule 3.050, the trial court can and should sua sponte enlarge the time for ruling on such a motion when the court is unable to rule upon a timely filed motion to mitigate within the allotted sixty-day window
- during the 60-day period, the trial court \had jurisdiction to determine whether it should enlarge time under the[] circumstances to review the timely-filed motion\
- decision from the Second District
- decision from the Second District
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Altenbernd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-22· cited 39×
- Lusskin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-08-26· cited 19×
- Howard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-12· cited 18×
- Brantley v. HollowayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-04· cited 13×
- Schlabach v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-05-20· cited 12×
- Spaulding v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-20· cited 12×
- Wesner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-09· cited 11×
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-01· cited 11×
- Byrd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-22· cited 11×
- Wiltzer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-12· cited 10×
- Royal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-14· cited 10×
- Lancaster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-07-17· cited 9×
- Seward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-19· cited 9×
- Roauer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-20· cited 9×
- McCormick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-01· cited 8×
- Cunniff v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-16· cited 7×
- Velazquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-21· cited 6×
- Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-07· cited 4×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-11· cited 2×
- Morrow v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-31· cited 2×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.