Skip to main content

Howard v. State

Citations

  • 914 So. 2d 455
  • 2005 WL 2508545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on a 3.800(c) motion filed one day late
  • noting that Howard’s trial motion to mitigate his sentence was untimely, thus divesting the trial court with jurisdiction to address the motion, and an order denying a motion to mitigate a sentence is a non-appealable order
  • “[W]e would advise the trial court that the routine language in its order that the defendant has the right to appeal this denial of a rule 3.800(c) motion is incorrect and should be eliminated. There is no right of appeal of those orders.”
  • \[W]e would advise the trial court that the routine language in its order that the defendant has the right to appeal this denial of a rule 3.800(c) motion is incorrect and should be eliminated. There is no right of appeal of those orders.\
  • “Keith Howard appeals an order denying his motion to mitigate his sentence. Such an order is not appealable, but we treat this as a petition for writ of certiorari, because the denial was based on lack of jurisdiction due to the motion’s untimeliness.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.