McCormick v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting relief from dismissal of rule 3.800(c) motion where court had three days to rule before time expired
• noting that pro se defendant was unable to file the motion until the end of the sixty-day period because he was in the process of being transported within the Department of Corrections for forty days and was unable to immediately access the law library after his arrival
• noting that pro se defendant was unable to file the motion until the end of the sixty-day period because he was in the process of being transported within the Department of Corrections for forty days and was unable to immediately access the law library after his arrival

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Schlabach v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-05-20· cited 12×
• KWAPIL v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-29· cited 6×
• Mitchell E. Fox v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-06-03· cited 4×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-04-30· cited 3×
• Rybolt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-15· cited 1×
• Madrigal v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-12· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Haag v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-02· cited 187×
• Moya v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-02-16· cited 25×
• State v. Brooks
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-05· cited 16×
• Brantley v. Holloway
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-04· cited 13×
• State v. Woodard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-11· cited 9×
• Daniels v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-23· cited 7×
• Cunniff v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-16· cited 7×