Skip to main content

Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. Storms

Citations

  • 102 A.D.2d 663
  • 476 N.Y.S.2d 918
  • 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18836

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff who did not hire a substitute bus but rather used one of its reserves could still recover for loss of use
  • absent decision by Court of Appeals, trial court is bound by decision of Appellate Division in its own Department although decision of another Department must be followed if trial court’s own Department has not ruled
  • “There is no logical or practical reason why a distinction should be drawn between cases in which a substitute vehicle is actually hired and those in which the plaintiff utilizes a spare.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Titone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

168 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.