Moss v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• testimony of alleged rape victim’s husband properly excluded because counsel failed to lay foundation for introduction as prior inconsistent statement by giving witness opportunity to admit or explain it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Russell v. Municipality of Anchorage
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-04-16· cited 34×
• Konrad v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-11-10· cited 33×
• Haakanson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-08-05· cited 31×
• Hubert v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1981-12-24· cited 27×
• Moreno v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2015-01-30· cited 18×
• Murdock v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-05-27· cited 15×
• Patterson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1984-10-05· cited 14×
• Worthy v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2000-04-14· cited 13×
• Gallagher v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-10-01· cited 11×
• Arnold v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-02-11· cited 11×
• State v. Heaps
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-08-12· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1977-05-13· cited 110×
• Fields v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1971-08-06· cited 72×
• Salazar v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1976-12-17· cited 53×
• Rutherford v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-12-28· cited 51×
• McMaster v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1973-07-16· cited 25×
• Offord v. Holmes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-08-11· cited 3×