Skip to main content

Rutherford v. State

Citations

  • 605 P.2d 16
  • 1979 Alas. LEXIS 603

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • investigators did not need specific authority to speak for the state on issue of driver’s negligence
  • supreme court may affirm trial court's ruling on different grounds from those advanced by the trial court as the basis for that ruling
  • \[T]he majority view is that an admission is not inadmissible because it is not based on firsthand knowledge or is made in the form of an otherwise inadmissible opinion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connor, Boochever, Burke, Matthews, Dimond, Rabinowitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.