Mosely v. Mundine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that expert’s knowledge regarding emergency room physicians’ scope of practice qualified him to opine on causal link between failing to interpret abnormality in x-ray and claimant’s cancer
• holding that expert’s knowledge regarding emergency room physicians’ scope of practice qualified him to opine on causal link between failing to interpret abnormality in x-ray and claimant’s cancer
• holding that expert = s knowledge regarding emergency room physicians = scope of practice qualified him to opine on causal link between failing to interpret abnormality in x-ray and claimant = s cancer
• holding expert’s causation opinion was not mere conjecture because it was supported with facts
• emergency room physician qualified to opine about causation regarding emergency room physician's ability to interpret routine chest x-rays and identify abnormality in patient later diagnosed with cancer
• expert opined that delayed diagnosis of cancer required invasive and aggressive treatment and shortened life expectancy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).