Estorque v. Schafer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding expert report’s failure to explain how or why the physicians’ failure to consult a urologist or gynecologist caused worsening or progression of patient’s listed conditions and therefore was insufficient to establish causation
• finding expert report’s failure to explain how or why the physicians’ failure to consult a urologist or gynecologist caused worsening or progression of patient’s listed conditions and therefore was insufficient to establish causation
• finding expert report's failure to explain how or why the physicians' failure to consult a urologist or gynecologist caused worsening or progression of patient's listed conditions and therefore was insufficient to establish causation
• specialized branches of medicine not implicated by defendant’s alleged negligence in failing to refer plaintiff to specialists for problems revealed in CT scan
• ―An appeals court may find an expert report deficient and remand the case to the trial court to decide whether to grant a thirty-day extension to cure the deficiency.‖
• expert’s report insufficient to establish causation where expert failed to explain how or why the physicians’ failure to consult a urologist or gynecologist caused any worsening or progression of patient’s listed conditions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).