In Re Windisch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a radiologist was not qualified to submit an expert report because his report did not indicate any experience with the embolization procedure at issue
• noting that a report authored by an unqualified doctor cannot be adequate
• noting that a report authored by an unqualified doctor cannot be adequate
• noting that a report authored by an unqualified doctor cannot be adequate
• discussing former section 13.01 and stating that ―[t]he requirement that a Section 13.01 report and curriculum vitae set forth the expert‘s knowledge of the procedure being questioned obtains even when the defendant physician and the expert share certification in the same specialty‖
• discussing former section 13.01 and stating that “[t]he requirement that a Section 13.01 report and curriculum vitae set forth the expert’s knowledge of the procedure being questioned obtains even when the defendant physician and the expert share certification in the same specialty”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).