District Court of Appeal of Florida· 7/25/2008
Morris v. State
Citations
- 988 So. 2d 120
- 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 11431
- 2008 WL 2851514
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding argument that an innocent man would take the breath test and prove the officer wrong was improper as it told the jury they should infer guilt because Morris did not take affirmative steps to prove his innocence
- prosecutor improperly shifted the burden of proof by arguing that an innocent person would “volunteer to take the [breath or blood alcohol tests or roadside exercises] to ‘prove’ his or her innocence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cohen, Lawson, Pleus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-18· cited 152×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-12-20· cited 126×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 58×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-10-23· cited 8×
- State v. BusciglioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-23· cited 7×
- Concha v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.