Fifth Circuit· 2/14/2013
Morris v. PLIVA, Inc.
Citations
- 713 F.3d 774
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3167
- 2013 WL 1662929
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that any “useful reporting” resulting from adequate testing would “ostensibly consist of some sort of warning”
- noting that any “useful reporting” resulting from adequate testing would “ostensibly consist of some sort of warning”
- although generic drug manufacturers might have duty under federal law to alert FDA of need to strengthen warnings and labels, Louisiana tort law imposed no such duty
- plaintiff could not sue generic drug manufacturer for failing to use a label not required by the FDA
- “Whether a warning is placed on the label on the bottle or in letters to distributors, any state law duty requiring generic manufacturers to act unilaterally in this area is preempted by federal law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Jones, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Yanise Germain v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, USA, IncSixth Circuit· 2014-06-27· cited 104×
- Sarah Speed v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2013-12-02· cited 79×
- Wagner v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2016-10-18· cited 67×
- Andrea Guarino v. Wyeth, LLCEleventh Circuit· 2013-06-25· cited 57×
- Reymond Meadaa v. K.A.P. Enterprises, L.L.CFifth Circuit· 2014-07-01· cited 52×
- In Re Fosamax (Alendronate Sodium) Products Liability LitigationThird Circuit· 2014-04-30· cited 43×
- Eckhardt v. Qualitest Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2014-05-13· cited 30×
- Shirley Brinkley v. Pliva, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2014-12-02· cited 28×
- Tina Johnson v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., etFifth Circuit· 2014-07-11· cited 26×
- In Re Reglan LitigationSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2016-08-22· cited 24×
- Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-06-13· cited 14×
- Elmazouni v. Mylan, Inc.N.D. Texas· 2016-12-01· cited 10×
- Fulgenzi v. PLIVA, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 2015-10-23· cited 7×
- Chatman v. Pfizer, Inc.S.D. Mississippi· 2013-03-28· cited 7×
- Amin-Akbari v. City of AustinW.D. Texas· 2014-10-01· cited 6×
- Glover v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-06-07· cited 6×
- Stephens v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, U.S.A., Inc.N.D. Alabama· 2014-10-01· cited 4×
- Weeks v. Wyeth, Inc.M.D. Alabama· 2015-08-03· cited 3×
- In re Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability Litigation Coordinated Pretrial ProceedingsN.D. Illinois· 2015-11-09· cited 3×
- Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. v. Dorothy TannerCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-11-20· cited 2×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court· 2009-03-04· cited 1,294×
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court· 2001-02-21· cited 956×
- Cuvillier v. TaylorFifth Circuit· 2007-10-05· cited 870×
- Schiller v. Physicians Resource Group Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2003-08-29· cited 792×
- Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2003-06-13· cited 527×
- PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 428×
- Jebaco, Inc. v. Harrah's Operating Co., Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2009-10-30· cited 122×
- Smith v. Wyeth, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2011-09-22· cited 62×
- Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2009-11-27· cited 56×
- Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.First Circuit· 2012-05-02· cited 22×
- Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2011-09-29· cited 11×
- Demahy v. Actavis, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2011-08-22· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.