Reymond Meadaa v. K.A.P. Enterprises, L.L.C

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when a final judgment is appealed “all interlocutory orders of the district court leading up to the judgment merge into the final judgment and become appealable at that time” (quotation omitted)
• explaining “all interlocutory orders of the district court leading up to the judgment merge into the final judgment and become appealable at that time” (quotation omitted)
• stating summary judgment affidavit must provide sufficient information to allow the court to conclude that the affiant’s assertions are indeed based on personal knowledge, not simply assert that the conclusions are based on personal knowledge
• stating summary judgment affidavit must provide sufficient information to allow the court to conclude that the affiant’s assertions are indeed based on personal knowledge, not simply assert that the conclusions are based on personal knowledge
• “[A]ll interlocutory orders of the district court leading up to the judgment merge into the final judgment . . . .” (quotation omitted)
• “A proper Rule 54(b) judgment is a final judgment for all purposes on the adjudicated claims.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).