Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• vacating the sections of our opinion in Wyeth addressing those issues
• expressly reinstating the portion of the opinion holding that brand-name manufacturers cannot be held liable under Minnesota law for damage caused by generic drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Shirley Bell v. Pfizer
  Eighth Circuit· 2013-06-14· cited 63×
• Andrea Guarino v. Wyeth, LLC
  Eleventh Circuit· 2013-06-25· cited 57×
• Morris v. PLIVA, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2013-02-14· cited 44×
• Wyeth, Inc. v. Danny Weeks and Vicki Weeks
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2014-08-15· cited 29×
• Phelps v. Wyeth, Inc.
  D. Oregon· 2013-04-02· cited 17×
• Frazier v. Mylan Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 2012-12-18· cited 12×
• Metz v. Wyeth LLC
  M.D. Florida· 2011-11-18· cited 11×
• Moretti v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co.
  D. Minnesota· 2012-02-13· cited 1×
• Penny Morris v. Wyeth, Incorporated
  Fifth Circuit· 2013-04-17

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 428×
• Mensing v. Wyeth, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 2009-11-27· cited 56×