D.C. Circuit· 6/1/2012
Morris Davis v. James Billington
Citations
- 401 U.S. App. D.C. 46
- 681 F.3d 377
- 2012 WL 1957974
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “none of the [chapters of the CSRA governing personnel actions] provide procedural rights or remedial measures for civil-service employees of non-Executive agencies”
- holding that the CSRA barred the plaintiff’s Bivens claims
- analyzing the Civil Service Reform Act and concluding that the statute’s use of the term “‘Executive agency’ . . . plainly does not contain the Library of Congress within the meaning of the statute” (citing 5 U.S.C. § 7103(a)(3))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sentelle, Henderson, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gonzalez v. OteroFirst Circuit· 2017-07-24· cited 55×
- John Bowman, Jr. v. Kimberly IddonD.C. Circuit· 2017-02-21· cited 43×
- XP Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of EnergyDistrict of Columbia· 2016-07-14· cited 37×
- Liff v. Office of Inspector General for U.S. Department of LaborD.C. Circuit· 2018-02-06· cited 33×
- Davis v. BillingtonDistrict of Columbia· 2014-12-19· cited 22×
- Jefferson v. HarrisDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-21· cited 22×
- Koch v. SchapiroDistrict of Columbia· 2013-09-10· cited 20×
- Ahuruonye v. U.S. Dep't of InteriorD.C. Circuit· 2018-05-01· cited 16×
- Davis v. BillingtonDistrict of Columbia· 2014-06-25· cited 13×
- Kelley v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2014-09-15· cited 13×
- Bloem v. Unknown Department of the Interior EmployeesDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-04· cited 11×
- Koch v. WhiteDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-29· cited 10×
- Coleman v. NapolitanoDistrict of Columbia· 2014-08-25· cited 9×
- Loumiet v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-06-13· cited 8×
- Sagar v. LewDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-30· cited 7×
- Loumiet v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 2017-11-28· cited 6×
- Cohen v. Bd. of Trs. of the Univ. of the D.C.D.C. Circuit· 2018-04-24· cited 5×
- Xp Vehicles, Inc. v. U.S. Department of EnergyDistrict of Columbia· 2015-07-14
- Loumiet v. United States of AmericaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-11-28
- Cohen v. Board of Trustees of the University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2018-04-24
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 28,443×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court· 2009-01-21· cited 13,928×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 6,021×
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,562×
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,238×
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 4,957×
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1994-02-23· cited 4,884×
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 4,586×
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 3,271×
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,039×
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court· 1980-04-22· cited 2,910×
- Correctional Services Corp. v. MaleskoSupreme Court· 2001-11-27· cited 1,854×
- Rankin v. McPhersonSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,766×
- Ashcroft v. al-KiddSupreme Court· 2011-05-31· cited 1,740×
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court· 1958-06-30· cited 1,658×
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court· 1966-10-17· cited 1,655×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.