California Court of Appeal· 6/10/1998
Morey v. Vannucci
Citations
- 64 Cal. App. 4th 904
- 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 573
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4458
- 98 Daily Journal DAR 6102
- 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 522
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Even if a contract appears unambiguous on its face, a latent ambiguity may be exposed by extrinsic evidence which reveals more than one possible meaning to which the language of the contract is yet reasonably susceptible”
- involving a contract for sale of a concrete plant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGUINESS
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Benach v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-03-15· cited 548×
- People v. SheltonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-01-05· cited 253×
- HUONG QUE, INC. v. LuuCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-04-30· cited 195×
- Skilstaf, Inc. v. Cvs Caremark Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-09· cited 183×
- Wolf v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-02-19· cited 142×
- Dore v. Arnold Worldwide, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2006-08-03· cited 141×
- Brian A. Buckley v. C.A. Terhune, Director of the California Department of CorrectionsNinth Circuit· 2006-03-17· cited 99×
- Armstrong Petroleum Corp. v. Tri-Valley Oil & Gas Co.California Court of Appeal· 2004-03-23· cited 92×
- American Alternative Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-01-25· cited 73×
- Tribeca Companies, LLC v. First American Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-08-26· cited 70×
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. ShewryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-03-21· cited 69×
- Halicki Films, LLC v. Sanderson Sales & MarketingNinth Circuit· 2008-11-12· cited 66×
- Wang v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business TrustCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-07-25· cited 64×
- In re Marriage of NassimiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-09-26· cited 57×
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC.C.D. California· 2011-01-05· cited 52×
- First National Mortgage Co. v. Federal Realty Investment TrustNinth Circuit· 2011-02-01· cited 48×
- Biren v. Equality Emergency Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2002-09-19· cited 44×
- Meridian Leasing, Inc. v. Associated Aviation Underwriters, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 2005-05-24· cited 41×
- Digital Envoy, Inc. v. Google, Inc.N.D. California· 2005-05-20· cited 34×
- Ram's Gate Winery, LLC v. RocheCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-04-09· cited 32×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-07-30· cited 1,052×
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court· 1965-06-17· cited 918×
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court· 1968-07-11· cited 846×
- Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 844×
- Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-08-24· cited 147×
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ZuckermanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-02-13· cited 131×
- Alling v. Universal Manufacturing Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1992-04-30· cited 69×
- Hernandez v. Badger Construction Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal· 1994-10-13· cited 63×
- Medical Operations Management, Inc. v. National Health Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1986-01-22· cited 41×
- New Haven Unified School District v. Taco Bell Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1994-05-11· cited 20×
- Byrne v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-12-22· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.