Skip to main content
· 3/23/2004

Armstrong Petroleum Corp. v. Tri-Valley Oil & Gas Co.

Citations

  • 11 Cal. Rptr. 3d 412
  • 116 Cal. App. 4th 1375
  • 158 Oil & Gas Rep. 674
  • 2004 Daily Journal DAR 3629
  • 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2502
  • 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining a “working interest” is “unlike a royalty interest” and “is burdened with the cost of development and operation of the property”
  • differentiating the 25 breach of a single obligation to repair, which could be a continuing injury, from a repeated, 26 periodic breach of divisible obligations
  • monthly payments on a gas and oil lease created a recurring obligation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dawson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.