Skip to main content
· 7/11/1968

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.

Citations

  • 69 Cal. 2d 33
  • 442 P.2d 641
  • 69 Cal. Rptr. 561
  • 40 A.L.R. 3d 1373
  • 1968 Cal. LEXIS 225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the notion that a contract can ever have a plain meaning
  • rational interpretation requires at least a preliminary consideration of all credible evidence offered to prove the intention of the parties
  • “The fact that the terms of an instrument appear clear to a judge does not preclude the possibility that the parties chose the language of the instrument to express different terms.”
  • see Emanuel v. Emanuel, 50 Cal.App.3d 56, 59 [123 Cal.Rptr. 249]
  • allowing extrinsic evidence to determine the parties' intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Traynor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.