Skip to main content
· 3/17/1969

Mora v. Martinez

Citations

  • 451 P.2d 992
  • 80 N.M. 88

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that purpose of requiring court to file findings of fact and conclusions of law is to place on the record the basis of the decision of the district court and require care on the part of the judge in consideration and adjudication of the facts
  • case should be remanded where trial court failed to make proper findings of fact and conclusions of law
  • “[N]unc pro tunc has 14 reference to the making of an entry now, of something which was actually previously 15 done, so as to have it effective as of the earlier date.”
  • “[N]unc pro tunc 22 has reference to the making of an entry now, of something which was actually 6 1 previously done, so as to have it effective as of the earlier date.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carmody, Moise, Noble

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.