Jesko v. Stauffer Chemical Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Rule 11-408 excludes evidence when its purpose is “proving the validity or invalidity of the claim or its amount, [however] an offer for another purpose is not within the rule” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• testimony of lay witness is admissible under Evidence Rule 701 where the opinion is rationally based on his own perceptions and is helpful in determination of basis for damage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).